For arriving at the decision Schmer how came
Jun H
Sec. off. after consultation with F.O. (who have ascertained from Chinese authorities already acting then) the Governor's view & de merits at least shall have informed This point Sheen Sen, oppose still more of his assumed to appear.
For Woden.
Js. 2016.
I don't understand the question
but was workers
Mortemque justified
without reference Rorke
Shelving & The par 5 of gay stat of
which
appointment
in
negotiations & of Lovertly carried
out
lither the
The Junk hade
considered & be
See minute
3
mint kmice &
am 40743
"
9 I cannot
make not dis is All 10/6
unlikely the would have
written por
justification.
Mr Meade
6 intent was
trace of
those
I do not find any rules having reached Governor Hennessy with
& perusal of our approval of them and perhaps he therefore considered himself at liberty to disregard them
any
Sir Hennedy
approved I then When Sir J. Wade came to Hong Kong
235
if he did not approve of them himself. Sir B. Robertson had sent them to Sir Hennessy same time before 5 March 1878 the date of his despatch transmitting them to Lord Derby. From that despatch it seems that Sir B.R. regarded the rules as subject to Mr Hennessy's approval of
Whose decision he had not then despatched
received. From the same
" it appears that Sir B.B. was coming home without waiting for Sir Hennessy's decision
they fell through. I don't
understand the statement in Sir
M. Hicks Beach's despatch of 7 Nov 29 Margy, Cass that the rules appeared from
Sir J. Wade's despatch of the 28th of
now in force". I should
the now
May 19th
79
have inferred the contras
F.O. in
7248/79
Lada Lokich ws
Nr 10/6
that the Bucks won't agree to be the ons. I, the Governor, & the Viceroy of Canton; & possibly Sir
!
For carrive at the decision Schmere how come
Jun H
Sec. off. after consultation with 7.0. (who have as coace as
a must
From
Chimas authorities alread acrftil then) the Governor'sfer: & de meshes at leash shave informes This pin Shein Sen, opwe still mon of his afuome to apper.
"
f
For Woden.
بیش
Js. 2016.
Idonor undentand the guntion
but was workers
Mortemque justified
without referem Rorke
Shelving & Tee par 5 of gay atat of
which
W
appment
in
muotiationale & of Loverty carried
avt
lither the
The Junk hade
couidend & be
See minte
3
mint kmice &
am 40743
"
9 Icannon
make not dis is All 10/6
unlikely the would have
witter por
justification.
Mr Meade
6 intent wa
trace of
those
I do not find any rules having reached Governor Hennesy with
& prepion of our approval of them and perhaps ho therefore considered kuinself at wherty to dinegard them
any
Air Hennedy
надной approved I then When Sir7. Wade wome nh Hoang hong
235
if he did not approve of them hunself. Si is Robertion had sent them to tur Hennepy same kimi before 5 march 1878 ther date of his despatch transmition, them to food Derby. From that despatch it seems that Fir B. R. regarded the rules as subject to Mr Hennepy, this approval of
Whose decision he had not then despoleh
received. From the same
" in appears that Sir B.B. was coming home without waiting for hir Hence perhaps Hennepy's decision
they fell through. I donon
understand the stalement in sin
M. Hichs Beach's despatch of 7 Nov 29 Magzy, Cass that the rules appeased from
Sir J. Wades despatch of the 28the of
now in force". Ishould
the now
May 19the
79
have inhered the contras
F.0. im
7248/79
Lada Lokich ws
Nr 10/6
that the Bucks won agree to bo the ons. I, the Governor, & the Viceroy of Cantor ; & possibly Sie
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.